Return to The Evidence for Impeachment |
Documents
Two-page FBI letter to Newt Gingrich Page 1 of 2 End of page 1 of 2 pages |
Two-page FBI letter to
Newt Gingrich Page 2 of 2 End of page 2 of 2 pages Analysis This document has great value as a case study for medical students studying psychiatric disorders, and law students studying corruption in the Justice Department, to learn just how dangerous people in government really are. Government techniques of lies, distortion, misrepresentation, euphemism, and misapplication of statute are addressed by paragraph. Para. 1. Mr. Kaul does not address the questions raised about jamming radio and television broadcasters in the Waco area, he does not even mention it, yet Congressman Gingrich does not care that Kaul answers no questions. Para. 2. The euphemism used here is "electronic perimeter" in place of deliberate radio interference, which is a crime under 47 USC 305, and 47 USC 333. |
Two-page FBI letter to
Newt Gingrich Analysis Para. 3. Controlling communications is essential only in a tactical military situation. Therefore, Kaul reveals tactical battlefield military operations, not law enforcement. Kaul refers to a means of sending and receiving communications and admits to jamming or "deny communications" to the amateur radio station at Mount Carmel Center. FBI's jamming kept its unwillingness to negotiate in good faith a secret. The finding and recommendation of the subcommittees in the 1995 House Waco Hearings is that FBI's absolute control over negotiations was wrong. There was, therefore, no need to control communications. Para. 4. Euphemism "electronic operations" used in place of deliberate radio interference. Violations were rampant. FBI had no warrant to tap telephones, or to divert telephone lines, or to intercept cellular communications (a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act), or to violated the Communications Act by using deliberate jamming. Neither the U.S. Attorneys, nor the NTIA have given any support to FBI's claim of authorization from these agencies. Indeed all documents have been classified to avoid criminal prosecution. Para. 5. Article 133 does not nullify other parts of the ITU rules (International Radio Law), especially Article 44 which outlaws jamming. The conditions of Article 133 were not met. The amateur radio station was no danger to security and the operators broke no law and complied with FCC rules. Radio jamming cannot be supported by law in peacetime, and violates the Constitution's protection of free speech. Only government stations violated ITU rules. |
Return to The Evidence for Impeachment
|
Para. 6. This deception
is easily exposed. When FCC supplied the jamming equipment (as
reported in Dallas Morning News) it became a co-conspirator with other agencies to
violate the very Act for which it was created to execute and enforce. Para. 7. Euphemism, "electronic operations" used in place of deliberate radio interference. FBI-FCC operations violated 47 USC 305, 47 USC 326, 47 USC 333, Articles 44 of the ITU rules, and Article 19 of (United Nations) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Classification of documents to hide evidence and avoid criminal prosecution is a crime also. Para. 8. Kaul hopes only to confuse and mislead. Clarification would require Kaul to answer the question on deliberate jamming of radio and television broadcasters. |
George
Zimmerlee 1998 Research on Criminal Government Rev. 11/98 |